Good Stuff for YOU

Tuesday, July 28, 2015

Tom Brady, Cell Phones, and Timing

Have you ever heard the phrase, life is all in the timing?

I'm sure most of you have; but if you haven't, it's a simple way of saying that all the choices, all the actions, and all the consequences of our lives are a matter of when as much as where. Walking across a busy street when the light shows you can go, and you live. Walking across when the light indicates you shouldn't, and you might not. Walking across in front of the car JUST as the driver looks at a text and you might just have issues as well.

Okay. Fair enough?

I've held off on weighing in on the whole DeflateGate scandal for the most part - I'm partisan, and that will naturally color my views. But in light of today's releases and decisions, I can't keep quiet any longer.

Let's look at a few issues, shall we?

1) Incriminating texts. There are only two possibilities regarding the existence of the so-called 'incriminating texts' (IT) (and we could argue all day what constitutes incriminating, but we're not going to. Let's just assume that the text in question is from Brady and says 'Deflate the footballs'.): They EXIST, or they DO NOT. There is no middle ground, no grey area. A or B, on or off, one or zero.

But here's the thing about texts: there's a sender and a receiver, and both people have copies of the entire conversation! If those IT are out there, they're on two phones - only one of which is Tom Brady's. There is a complete record of the texts on the other phone as well. Now, there is no mention in the Wells Report of the text of any such IT, just a sense that there's something else floating around out there.

That means that there weren't any IT on the phones they did have access to, and that their desire to view Brady's phone was no more than a fishing expedition, a hope to discover something incriminating.

I know that this was not a court of law, and the standards are remarkably lower, but think of it this way: when the police go to the judge and ask for a search warrant, they have to be very precise in describing exactly what they're looking for. It has to be 'We want to search the house of Joe Smith for two kilos of marijuana we have reason to believe is present' and if they happen to discover a stash of guns, ammo, and $15,000 hidden under the mattress in the process of finding the pot (which was in his boot under the bed), well, that's admissible. But they can't ask the judge, 'We want to search the house of Joe Smith because he has a reputation of being a bad, bad boy and we think we might find something. We don't know what it is, but we're sure there's something there.' That won't fly; a judge would laugh you out of court. Ted Wells, being a highly-regarded lawyer, knows this. Yet he still wanted to try it with Brady's cell phone.

ANYWAYS, the point of this is that if the texts exist they're on another phone, if they didn't exist then they're not on any phone and they were going fishing - and I certainly don't blame Brady for refusing them that!

2) Destroyed Cell Phone. Here's the simple question: Do the facts stand up? Brady has stated that he routinely destroys, or has his assistant destroy, his cell phone after about four months. Therefore, there should be a shredded cell phone (and a new one purchased) at the beginning of November 2014, the beginning of July 2014, and back and back. In fact, there should be another record for July 2015, showing the same, if that statement is true. This is easy to check and virtually impossible to fake, unless the NFL wants to believe that back in 2002 (or whenever it started) Tom Brady had the foresight to start destroying cell phones just in case he ever needed deniability.

3) Wells Report. Just a mention here. The Report blasted Brady - and he was suspended in part - for failing to hand over a cell phone (presumably, the one that was destroyed)(although, how many cell phones might Tom Brady have? You really think he has just one?) when asked. That's how it's worded - he didn't hand it over. Not 'he told us it was destroyed'; not handing it over. That certainly implies that it existed, doesn't it?

3) Timing. Stephen A. Smith is known for many things. He likes to be in the limelight; he likes to have a reputation for being the first with the information; he is seen as an unpaid mouthpiece for the NFL; he has been seen as having an antipathy towards the New England Patriots.

So who better for the NFL to leak information to?

'I've heard' said Smith - not reporting, just passing on a rumor - 'that on or slightly before March 6, 2015' Brady destroyed his cell phone. ON OR SLIGHTLY BEFORE. Oh, and in the same gossip-fest? Smith gets to break the news that he 'heard' (again, deniability) that the NFL would be upholding the suspension in the next 24 to 48 hours.


So as Brady begins to be seen as a sympathetic figure - hung out to dry by a flawed process and made to wait and wait and wait for the result of an appeal - and as more and more of the NFL fan base begins to think that this whole issue is much ado about nothing, suddenly there's a report that, on the surface, certainly appears to make Tom Brady look like he actively concealed evidence. This hits the morning news cycle; by lunch it's water-cooler talk across the country; and by mid-afternoon, the news of the upholding comes out.


Certainly interesting timing, don't you think?

'How can we make Brady look bad? People are starting to like him again!'
'Well, we could bring up that cell phone thing.'
'Yeah, but he explained that.'
'We don't have to say that. Or, maybe, just slip that in. Nobody will hear it anyways.'
'So who should we leak this to? We can't sit on the decision much longer.'
'Call up Smith. If he reports the cell phone thing, he can also break the timing for the appeal.'
'Make sure he knows, if he leaves out the cell phone, he'll never work in dis bidness again!'
'Got it, boss.'

In conclusion, I find it awfully convenient for the NFL that Brady destroyed his cell phone.

Frankly, I think the federal courts will think so too.

Saturday, April 4, 2015

Shepherd's Pie

Okay, I suppose that TECHNICALLY what I made (and what I hereby present to you) is what a Brit would call a COTTAGE pie - since I didn't use lamb, but rather beef and bison (yes, bison). And, having made a bunch of stock earlier in the day, I was totally out of onions (and scallions). So there was THAT to overcome, too.

Still and all, I was happy with the result. You want to see? Okay. Here you go.

Ready? Go!

Shepherd's (Cottage) Pie

1# Ground Beef (no leaner than 90/10)
1# Ground Bison
10 tbsp. butter (4 tbsp. twice and 2 tbsp. once)
6-8 oz Vegetables (more if fewer veggies used; less if more variety)
1 cup chicken stock
1 tbsp. beef base (2 boullion cubes, if no base available)
2 tbsp. onion powder
4 oz Manchego cheese, shredded
4 oz cheddar cheese, shredded
4 oz edam cheese, shredded
1 tbsp. Worcestershire sauce (or more; to taste)
3 large potatoes; or 6-7 small
heavy cream (to taste)
to taste S & P

Heat your oven to 400.
Peel the potatoes (optional - ALWAYS optional to peel potatoes, in my opinion. I rarely peel potatoes; however, you need to make sure they're washed if you don't peel) and quarter (why do we say quarter? It's more than four pieces; it's actually 8, or maybe even 12 if it's a large potato. But I guess you can't say 'eighth' or 'twelfth' your potato). Place in pot and cover with about 1" of water, add salt, and bring to boil. Cook for about 20 minutes until cooked through.

While the potatoes ccok, melt four tbsp. of butter in your fry or saute pan - should be at least 10", and should be cast iron, but hey, use what you have! Add onion powder to butter, then add your veggies as appropriate.

As appropriate? Yes - carrots take a long time to cook, whereas peas and corn take very little time. So start with what needs the longest cooking time and work from there. Peas and corn should be added LAST (even after the meat).

Mix the beef base with your chicken stock. (WHAT? Yes, chicken and beef - richer, deeper flavor than either on their own. This is ESPECIALLY important if you have boullion cubes instead of base.) Add the Worcestershire sauce as well.

Once your veggies are cooked through, add your beef and bison. Bison is a very lean meat, so you need to balance that with the beef. Add your stock and continue to cook until the meat is JUST browned. NOW, add your peas and/or corn.

(I used carrots and peas in my version.)

Place your beef/veggie mix in the bottom of a 13 x 9 pan.

Remember your potatoes? Once they're done, remove from the heat and drain off the water. Add the next portion of butter (4 tbsp.) and cream and mash. Add S & P to taste (but go LIGHT, as there is plenty of flavor in the filling).

Layer potatoes on the filling, Place the last portion of butter in SMALL, THIN portions on top of the potatoes, then put the pan in your oven. Set a timer for 30 minutes, and go and have a drink. Just a small one, though, as you have more work to do!

Did the timer just go off? Take the cheeses and sprinkle them over top of the potatoes, then put the whole thing back in the oven under the BROILER for about five minutes or until golden brown.

Remove from oven and beat off the frantic assault from your hungry family. When you serve, you ought to hear this wonderful CRUNCH as you punch through the crust.

Time to eat!

As always, comments and feedback are welcome!

Thursday, March 26, 2015

Orange Shortbread Petit Fours

Say what?

Back to the cooking side.

First, a definition. What is a petit four? The simplest aspect is that a petit four is a dessert that can be eaten in one or two bites. It can be a petit four sec (dry - a plain cookie), a petit four glace (iced - the image everyone has of a small cake with icing coating it all around), a fresh petit four (typically with fruit), and the new 'it thing' - petit four prestige (using new techniques and tools). It should complement the meal, echo the flavors, without necessarily utilizing the same ingredients or flavors. (Huh? If you have a raspberry vinaigrette on your salad, your petit four might have another citrus but not raspberry.) The key, for me, is the single bite - so that's what I did.

I made an orange shortbread cookie and filled it with a cream cheese orange icing. You want to see?

The little minion is there for fun. Okay, yeah, for scale.

Ready to cook? Okay - here we go!


1 cup butter, softened (BUTTER, not margarine! You need butter for the melting point.)
1/2 cup sugar
2 cups flour, sifted (All-purpose)
1/2 tsp salt
1/2 tsp vanilla extract
2 tbsp. heavy cream
zest of 1 medium orange


12 oz cream cheese, softened
8 oz butter, softened (see note above about butter)
2 tbsp. vanilla
1/4 tsp orange extract
zest of 1 medium orange
13 1/2 oz confectioner's sugar
a/n Yellow food coloring

The zest is a key - the most potent part of the orange, with all the oils and the greatest concentration of flavor. If you don't have a microplane, do yourself a favor - go get one! They're only a few bucks.

Okay, you're going to be bouncing back and forth between the two recipes, so we're going to number the steps. The step will be followed by a (C) for cookie or (I) for icing, so you can separate the recipes later. If there is no ( ), then it's for the combined recipe.
Helpful hint: Pull your butter and cream cheese from the fridge WELL before it's time to cook.

1) Sift together salt and flour (C)
2) Add zest to sugar and mix until sugar is uniformly colored (this allows a greater spread of the orange flavor, it will be carried with the sugar). Cream butter and sugar until light and fluffy. In 2-3 additions, stir flour into the butter mix (C)
3) Add vanilla and cream, stir until just incorporated (C)
4) Separate dough into two portions, wrap in plastic wrap and refrigerate 2-3 hours. If pressed, place in freezer for 1-2 hours (do NOT allow to freeze!) (C)
5) Mix together cream cheese and zest. Once mixed, add half the sugar - mix until no lumps are present (I)
6) Mix together butter and remaining sugar - mix until no lumps are present (I) (If you are making this icing for a cake, mix as little as possible - for this use, you want it a little bit more spreadable)
7) Add butter mix to cream cheese mix and combine. Add vanilla and extract (I) (If you don't have orange extract, substitute 2 oz of orange juice [look! fresh orange juice, squeezed!] for the vanilla)
8) Preheat oven to 350 F (325F if using a convection oven) (C)
9) Remove half the dough from cooler and roll out on a lightly floured surface to about 1/4 to 1/8 inch thick (C) (You can also use confectioners sugar in place of flour, but make sure you sift it first. The benefit? You don't end up with patches of flour unmixed on the cookies.)
10) Cut out cookies - roughly 1" circles (C)
11) Place cookies on parchment lined sheet pan and bake for 8-10 minutes or until just golden around edges (C)
12) Allow to cool to touch (C)
13) Place icing in a piping bag (in a pinch, a gallon storage bag will work), cut a 1/4" diameter hole
14) Set half the cookies upside-down. Apply piping to center of cookie, coming to 1/8" from edge of cookie and rising 1/2". Top with remaining cookies and refrigerate 10-15 minutes (to firm up icing)

That wasn't so bad, was it? ENJOY!

As always, looking forward to your comments and pictures!

Tuesday, March 24, 2015

PAX East

What is PAX? What is PAX East? Why, as a matter of fact, do I care?

PAX is a gaming convention - actually, a series of them. PAX Prime, the original (Seattle); PAX East (Boston), PAX South (San Antonio, newest) and PAX Australia (guess where?) - Penny Arcade eXpo. Founded by the guys who created the Penny Arcade webcomic. It is a HUGE event, drawing tens of thousands of people to each convention. You doubt, perhaps?

That was the scene late Sunday afternoon, the END of the eXpo.



But WAIT! I hear you cry. You? GAMING?

Yeah, not really, not my scene. However, being the father of a 16-year-old, STEM-obsessed boy... Well, it's what he wanted for Christmas. And I couldn't exactly let him go along, not to his first Con. Next year, that's another story...

It was impressive, though. HUGE, well-planned displays, spreading across the floor of the BCEC (Boston Convention and Exhibition Center, just a few blocks away from the Children's Museum in South Boston).

Let me back up a minute. The saga begins last year when my son first mentions, Hey, Dad, how about going with me to PAX East next year? Sure, sure, I say, having NO CLUE what I'm getting myself into. At least monthly he reminds me, until October. Then it becomes, Okay Dad, you need to keep track of when the passes go on sale, they sell out quickly. Sure, sure. Quickly. Right. (See, my experience has been with DragonCon, where the passes for the following year go on sale as the current Con is ending, and are available all year long, right up to the beginning of the NEXT Con.) But quickly is what he meant - it seemed that the three-day passes (the best bargain, Friday-Saturday-Sunday for $90) sold out for 2014 in TEN MINUTES.


Now I start taking it a little more seriously. I start following on Twitter, check in every so often - but the final alert comes from him. DAD THE PASSES ARE ON SALE NOW! he texts. Fortune smiled on him, as I was home and right by the computer. It was a few minutes after three on a November afternoon. I type in my information, place my order for two three-day passes, and...


WHAT?! (I find out later, they sold out in SIX minutes!)

I think quickly and immediately purchase single-day passes for Saturday and Sunday, figuring that missing Friday, while unfortunate, is probably all for the best. I won't miss work or college (yes, back in school - but that's another post), he won't miss school.


So now the waiting begins again. PAX, apparently, sends all of the passes out a couple weeks before the event. Lo and behold, late February and I get a stiff, thick envelope, and the passes are enclosed.


Friday of the event, pick him up after school, bring him back to my home, feed him and get to bed early. Prompt start the next day! Yeah, prompt. Up before dawn, out of the house before sunup, but we get down to Boston about 10:30 (panels begin at 10, but there weren't any we wanted to go to). Find a parking spot that does NOT cost an arm and a leg a block away from the BCEC, and walk get in a queue. We head down the block on the right side of the sidewalk, a stream of conventioners flowing down the LEFT side back TOWARD the BCEC. We end up walking to Melcher St, about 3/4 mile, I estimate, before reaching the end and turning around to walk back.

Okay, exercise done.

We get in and - the building just swallows up the crowd. Oh, it's THERE, but it's not oppressive. Even down on the floor, it's not bad. He poses for a picture with a couple cosplayers for his favorite game, SMITE (kind of a war-of-the-gods game; actually, it sounds pretty cool).

Then we get out and wander. It was a couple hours before the first panel, so we took advantage of the time to explore. The displays were keyed toward gamers, channeling them into live game-play, electronic and table games both, letting them have a chance to play alpha and beta versions (as well as on-the-market products) - think of CES for gamers.

The first panel he wanted to go to was, no surprise, with the creators and current developers of SMITE. It was actually an interesting panel, touching on history, current product, and future developments. Now, I have to explain a bit here: SMITE is a PC game, but they are going live onto the Xbox One platform in April, and that got a bunch of questions.

Next up was a panel about designing and marketing your own tabletop game - and these games that the panelists discussed ranged from full-on board games and RPGs to a game which is played from a single business-card sized 'rulebook'. The panelists were both encouraging and realistic about the creation, developing, and marketing process, giving the audience hope and tempering expectations at the same time.

We left, after the second panel. One thing that made this trip possible was the presence of my brother, just outside Boston, and his willingness to put us up for the night, saving us the hotel costs. YAY. Dinner, however, I let my son splurge a bit. Another early night, since it was Daylight Saving Weekend and it was REALLY not the weekend I needed to lose sleep! Oh well. Back to the eXpo.

Not as lucky parking on Sunday - dropped him off in front so he could get in and scope things out. One of the draws of PAX is that the con gives out swag bags, as well as the vendors. The issue, though, is that EVERYONE wants the swag bags. So he bailed on waiting in line - his estimate was 5,000 people waiting. Meanwhile, back in the car - I ended up 1 1/4 miles away, in a remote shuttle lot. Parked in a puddle, caught the shuttle, then took a look at the 'monster' line. Didn't look so bad, so I jumped in. My son is texting me, wondering where I was, because the panel was getting ready to head in, and I explain that the line was MOVING. Grab a swag bag - and am sorely disappointed. Minimal stuff, or at least compared to what I was led to expect. Oh well. C'est la vie (in perfect freaking French).

The panel was a reading from a play called SALVAGE, presented by the Flux Theatre Ensemble. It was an interesting reading - it's set in the near future, after some sort of apocalypse, and focuses on the activities of a team of salvage experts and revelations about their personal lives. They read the first three or four scenes, and it was FASCINATING. For more information about the play - which will be playing in NYC in April of 2015 - you can click above or HERE.

Our final panel was, personally, the most disappointing. It was described as 'Pushing Boundaries: Science Fiction in Role Playing Games', and that was intriguing. What role would SF play in RPG, and how can you play with the idea? At least, that's what I THOUGHT they'd talk about. Instead, it was an hour on how to avoid 'ism's - from the panel blurb, 'how do we continue to move beyond the colonialism, racism, and sexism the genre carries with it?'


Now, while I will freely admit that SF reflects the period in which it was written, , GOOD SF tends to explore different aspects of life no matter the era. That's why Foundation and The Martian Chronicles and Stranger In A Strange Land are classics despite their age and are still in print. BAD SF is not going to get read; it will fade into obscurity. As a writer - or a game designer - I don't need a panel of self-described experts telling me what not to do.


One more hour-long roaming of the floor, and we were done.

Why PAX? If you're a gamer, you owe it to yourself to at least take in a single day - Prime, East, South, or Australia. Just remember, if you want to do a full weekend, you have to hit it early. If you want just a couple days, or just one, then you have a few days more, but they sell out within two weeks.

Link to PAX HERE (or any of the other 'PAX' references).

And a couple more pictures:


Tuesday, March 3, 2015

How About Some Tuna?

Tuna is good for you.

That's something we've all been told, and you know what? They're right. It is a low-fat source of protein and it can carry just about any flavor you want to impart. You can cook it from raw to just barely cooked to well-done and still have a consistent product. You can go Asian, make a mock steak, cook it and crumble it on a salad...

Or turn it into a BLT.

That's right - how about a Tuna BLT?

Hang in there, let me run through it before you scream into the night!

This recipe serves four. Or maybe two, if you're REALLY hungry!


8 slices of bacon (thick-sliced peppered bacon is good for this)
2 tbsp. EVOO (or an oil of your choice; EVOO carries a good flavor)
1 red onion, chopped
2 cloves garlic, chopped
S & P to taste
1 cup loosely packed sun-dried tomatoes
2 tbsp. balsamic vinegar
2 tbsp. brown sugar (loose pack)
1 tsp Worcestershire sauce
4 6-8oz 3/4-inch thick tuna steaks
1 tbsp. grill seasoning
4 large slices of peasant bread (needs to be coarse, ciabatta rolls work beautifully)
8 red-leaf lettuce leaves (or romaine or boston or...choose your lettuce)

(There's an alternate recipe for this, and I'll list it at the bottom.)

1) Preheat your oven to 375. On a slotted broiler pan, bake the bacon until crisp. (Mmmmm, bacon) This will take 15-20 minutes. And if you are smart, you'll add a few extra slices for nibbling.

2) In a small saucepan, heat 1 tbsp. EVOO over medium high heat. Add the onion and garlic, cook until softened, about 7 minutes (smaller the dice the faster the cook). Season with S&P. Stir in 1/2 cup water, sun-dried tomatoes, vinegar, sugar and Worcestershire and bring to a boil. Lower the heat and simmer until thick, 7 to 8 minutes.

3) Season the tuna with grill seasoning. (Here's a hint, if you don't have grill seasoning - just do S&P. I have some smoked black salt, which worked really well, imparted some of that smoky grilled taste.) In a large skillet, heat the remaining EVOO over medium heat. Add the tuna and cook for 2 minutes each side for medium rare.

4) Toast the bread. Build with the lettuce, then tuna, bacon, and tomato jam. Now, enjoy!

Okay, so you know me well enough, I can't leave good enough alone (and, like you, I don't always have EVERYTHING that my recipes call for on hand, so I do plenty of substituting. Instead of step 2 above, and those ingredients, try this:
1 cup FRESH tomatoes
3 tbsp. brown sugar
3 tbsp. balsamic
2 tbsp. Worcestershire
1 tbsp. minced garlic
1 1/2 cup water
Add all these into a MEDIUM saucepan, bring it up to a boil, keep it there for about 5 minutes, then reduce the heat to simmer for another five minutes.

I've got a photo here; it's not of the one we made, because, well, we ate them before we had a chance to think about photographing them. But, it gives you an idea.

I hope you enjoy it - and as always, you have questions, shoot me a line!


Thursday, February 12, 2015

Change Of Direction

You might know that I have worked in restaurants at all sorts of levels and all types of food for twenty years. BUT, what you probably don't know is that, other than the necessary OTJ training to get me through my immediate tasks I had NEVER received any formal training.

Well, not any more.

So I'll be sharing recipes here for you to enjoy and try out!

Recipe for today?

30 Minute Bread & Butter Pickles

Yes, you read that right. 30 minutes. Not 24 hours, not a week, not even overnight. THIRTY MINUTES!

You'll need:

1 Large cucumber (sliced to about 1/4" thickness). You CAN use pickling cukes, but regular ones work just fine (save a few pennies!)
1 tsp Salt (Kosher or regular)
1 Onion (thinly sliced - about same as the cukes)
1/2 tsp Mustard Seed (you can substitute ground mustard if that's all you have)
1 Cup Sugar (you CAN use an artificial sweetener but more about that later)
1/2 Cup Distilled White Vinegar
1/2 Cup Water
1/4 tsp Celery Seed
1/4 tsp Ground Turmeric

In a saucepan, combine the water, vinegar and sugar.

[Time for a rant about sweeteners. USE SUGAR! BESIDES the occasional nasty side effects (for a good laugh, read the reviews of Sugar-Free Haribo Gummy Bears, made with Sorbitol), there is a physiological reason to stay away from them. All of the chemical sweeteners are anywhere from 70 to 13,000 SWEETER than sugar on an ounce-for-ounce basis. To bring the sweetness down, they have to use non-nutritive chemicals to 'bulk it out' to reach the right volume, or use a minuscule amount. That's not such a problem, but here's the rub: your taste buds regenerate every three to five days. The more of a certain flavor you EAT, the more taste buds REGENERATE. The more taste buds of a certain type you have, the more you crave that flavor, so you go seeking more. See the issue? Yeah. Not good. Just use sugar, and keep it in moderation! End Rant.]

Bring the mix to a boil. Once boiling, add the cukes, salt, mustard, celery and turmeric. Allow to boil for 20 minutes. Remove from heat and place into a jar. Cap and refrigerate until ready to serve.

If you need to serve immediately, use a metal mixing bowl filled with ice. Place your saucepan in the ice and stir and stir and stir until the temperature drops.

See? Easy!

I'll start doing this more often. Feedback is always appreciated - and until next time, good eating!

Wednesday, January 21, 2015


Talking about sports HERE?!

Well, yes. I do live in New England, after all; I am a football fan; and yes, I root for the Patriots (previous warts and all) so OF COURSE I have an opinion about this whole kerfuffle.

Here are the issues (as I see them):

1) Did the Patriots intentionally underinflate the footballs?

Yup. That's it. Now, that's not to say there aren't corollary issues.

a) Did they test the balls the Colts were using?
b) Did the refs notice any difference with the balls?

Look, there are two options. Either they intentionally did it, or they didn't. Whether they were underinflated is NOT IN DISPUTE - 11 of 12 balls were underinflated by two pounds EACH. If they did it intentionally, why? They pasted the Colts; they would have pasted them ANYWAYS. They didn't need to try for such a dramatic advantage.

If they did it intentionally - hammer 'em. Fire Belichik, fine the team, fine the owner, take away draft picks - this was totally unnecessary and should - MUST - be punished.

IF, however, it was unintentional - if they say 'We inflated them, the refs tested them, we don't know what happened' and turn it into a 'he said/he said' kind of thing - then other, more disturbing questions arise. Questions like -

Did they test the balls the Colts were using? (Probably not. There wasn't an issue with their footballs, as far as anyone reported. It's unlikely that they were tested.) What was the result? Were they underinflated as well? (If they were, then that points to a mechanical issue with the pressure gauge that the refs used to test the balls, and therefore NO unfair advantage was sought.)

Did the refs notice anything before it was pointed out to them? What did they testify?? (If they didn't see any difference, then the Colts were using the same pressure balls and again no issue.) If there WAS a difference there are two FURTHER questions, which begin to call the NFL into question: Are the refs INCOMPETENT or CORRUPT? Either they can't tell the difference between properly inflated balls and underinflated balls - two or three refs handling each ball on every play all game long - OR they were told NOT to notice the difference, either by bribe (Patriots) or by fiat (NFL).

THIS IS A HUGE ISSUE. The NFL has enough troubles on their plate; PROOF that their refs were incompetent would be devastating. What would be worse, of course, is if they were either paid off to ignore the deflation. That would show that yes, the refs CAN be bought - how many games have been decided this year by a poorly-timed flag? A penalty that swung the game one way or another? WHO PAID FOR THOSE FLAGS??

WORST, though, would be that the NFL Front Office - by which you can read Roger Goddell if you so choose - ORDERED them to ignore the deflation. Do I need to expound on the can of worms THAT would open if this was true? I didn't think so.

Look, I know that the Patriots aren't perfect. However, there are questions - HUGE questions - that still need to be answered before we say that the Patriots were on the wrong side of the rule book.

Just my two cents. Feel free to add yours.

ADDENDUM (in light of the two press conferences today by Belichik and Brady): The article at the following link is AMAZING - great questions! Tom E. Curran